Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610837›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Practical application of good participatory practices for trials of emerging pathogens: Developing materials for use in ACTIV-3, -3b, and ACTIV-associated COVID-19 trials.

Paola Del Carmen Guerra-de-Blas, Rubria Marines-Price, Olga Milman, Danae Deal, Jonathan Marchand, Jessica Linton, Sue Meger, John Rule, Thomas L Holland, Jonathan Kitonsa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paola Del Carmen Guerra-de-BlasThe Mexican Emerging Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network (LaRed), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3050-6865
Rubria Marines-PriceOffice of Advanced Practice Providers, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-8233
Olga MilmanThe Bronx Veterans Medical Research Foundation Inc., James J. Peters Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Danae DealClinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Jonathan MarchandClinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Jessica LintonClinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Sue MegerDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
John RuleNational Association of People with HIV, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas L HollandDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-9010
Jonathan KitonsaMRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Yvette DelphAxle Informatics, North Bethesda, MD, USA.
INSIGHT OTAC, ACTIV-3 TICO, ACTIV-3 substudy VATICO, and ACTIV-3b TESICO Study Groups

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic required an immediate global clinical research response. The ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines)-3 trials and the ACTIV-associated Outpatient Treatment with Anti-Coronavirus Immunoglobulin trial used Good Participatory Practices (GPP) to develop materials for study implementation from a global network perspective. GPP guidelines offer a framework for engaging stakeholders throughout the research process. This paper provides an overview of the materials developed and their applicability in various settings, reports results from a survey of study site personnel on the materials' usefulness, summarizes important lessons learned, and serves as a reference for networks eager to apply GPP. Survey results showed that flipbooks and overview videos were highly ranked. Stakeholder input was valuable in developing easily understandable participant-facing materials with culturally appropriate images. Materials should be available to submit with the initial protocol submissions to ethics committees, and in formats that accommodate a wide range of institutional resources, policies, and infection-control practices. This article emphasizes the importance of GPP, including stakeholder consultation, in developing materials that support clinical research and address language, cultural, and sociopolitical barriers during a pandemic. The findings will be used to optimize efforts and resource allocation for new and ongoing studies.

Indexed as

clinical trial implementationCOVID-19 trialsGood Participatory Practiceinformed consent processparticipant-facing materialsrecruitmentstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID39610837
PMCPMC11602519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.