ArticleMethodsX2024
Exploring the efficacy of various CNN architectures in diagnosing oral cancer from squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of convolutional neural network-based AI in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Hyperspectral imaging in oral oncology: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cancer can result from mutations in cells located in the lips or mouth. Diagnosing oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is particularly challenging, often occurring at advanced stages. To address this, computer-aided diagnosis methods are increasingly being used. In this work, a deep learning-based approach utilizing models such as VGG16, ResNet50, LeNet-5, MobileNetV2, and Inception V3 is presented. NEOR and OCSCC datasets were used for feature extraction, with virtual slide images divided into tiles and classified as normal or squamous cell cancer. Performance metrics like accuracy, F1-score, AUC, precision, and recall were analyzed to determine the prerequisites for optimal CNN performance. The proposed CNN approaches were effective for classifying OCSCC and oral dysplasia, with the highest accuracy of 95.41 % achieved using MobileNetV2. Key findings: Deep learning models, particularly MobileNetV2, achieved high classification accuracy (95.41 %) for OCSCC.CNN-based methods show promise for early-stage OCSCC and oral dysplasia diagnosis. Performance parameters like precision, recall, and F1-score help optimize CNN model selection for this task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.