ArticleEpigenetics reports2024
Characterizing DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Cord Blood and Identifying Sex-Specific Differences using the Illumina EPIC Array.
Article in Epigenetics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation, an epigenetic mark, has become a common outcome in epidemiological studies with the aid of affordable and reliable technologies. Yet the most widespread technique used to assess methylation, bisulfite conversion, does not allow for the differentiation of regular DNA methylation (5-mC) and other cytosine modifications, like that of hydroxymethylation (5-hmC). As both 5-mC and 5-hmC have distinct biological roles, sometimes with opposing effects, it is crucial to understand the difference between these marks. To characterize 5-mC and 5-hmC in cord blood and expand on previously published results in smaller cohorts, 73 samples from infants in the Michigan Mother Infant Pairs cohort were paired bisulfite and oxidative bisulfite converted. 5-mC and 5-hmC were assessed on the Illumina Infinium EPIC array, using maximum likelihood methods, and sex-specific differences of these marks were analyzed. 5-mC and 5-hmC were both broadly distributed across the genome, and 5-hmC was prevalent, with proportions of 0.01-0.55. Sex-specific analysis revealed total methylation was different on 17,000 sites (q<0.05), but only different at 1,866 and 5 sites of 5-mC and 5-hmC specifically. These results add additional support to the literature and demonstrate the importance of differentiating between 5-mC and 5-hmC in epidemiological studies going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.