Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610770›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics reports2024

Characterizing DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Cord Blood and Identifying Sex-Specific Differences using the Illumina EPIC Array.

Rebekah L Petroff, Dana C Dolinoy, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Jaclyn M Goodrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebekah L PetroffDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Dana C DolinoyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Vasantha PadmanabhanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jaclyn M GoodrichDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Prenatal Exposures and Child Health Outcomes: A Statewide StudyUG3OD023285 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARONE, CHARLES JAMES, ELLIOTT, MICHAEL R. · 2016 to 2024
$12.9M
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY PRE/POST DOCTORAL RES.TRAININGT32ES007062 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Justin Adam Colacino · 1985 to 2026
$10.5M
Untargeted Analysis ResourceU2CES026553 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MEEKER, JOHN D. · 2015 to 2015
$9.5M
Environmental Epigenomics and Precision Environmental HealthR35ES031686 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2020 to 2026
$6.1M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES036084 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas A Kocarek · 2024 to 2026
$5.2M
Project 3: Developmental Exposures and Diet: Epigenetics of Metabolic SyndromeP01ES022844 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PADMANABHAN, VASANTHA, PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN · 2013 to 2018
$3.9M
Endocrine Disruptors and Fetal DevelopmentR01ES017005 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PADMANABHAN, VASANTHA · 2009 to 2010
$998k
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES022844NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES036084NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017005NIEHS NIH HHS R35 ES031686NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007062NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026553NIH HHS UG3 OD023285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation, an epigenetic mark, has become a common outcome in epidemiological studies with the aid of affordable and reliable technologies. Yet the most widespread technique used to assess methylation, bisulfite conversion, does not allow for the differentiation of regular DNA methylation (5-mC) and other cytosine modifications, like that of hydroxymethylation (5-hmC). As both 5-mC and 5-hmC have distinct biological roles, sometimes with opposing effects, it is crucial to understand the difference between these marks. To characterize 5-mC and 5-hmC in cord blood and expand on previously published results in smaller cohorts, 73 samples from infants in the Michigan Mother Infant Pairs cohort were paired bisulfite and oxidative bisulfite converted. 5-mC and 5-hmC were assessed on the Illumina Infinium EPIC array, using maximum likelihood methods, and sex-specific differences of these marks were analyzed. 5-mC and 5-hmC were both broadly distributed across the genome, and 5-hmC was prevalent, with proportions of 0.01-0.55. Sex-specific analysis revealed total methylation was different on 17,000 sites (q<0.05), but only different at 1,866 and 5 sites of 5-mC and 5-hmC specifically. These results add additional support to the literature and demonstrate the importance of differentiating between 5-mC and 5-hmC in epidemiological studies going forward.

Indexed as

5-hmC5-mCDNA hydroxymethylationDNA methylationepigeneticsIllumina EPIC array

Identifiers

PMID39610770
PMCPMC11600988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.