ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Effectiveness, quality of life, and safety of secukinumab versus conventional systemic therapy in patients with erythrodermic psoriasis: a comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for bimekizumab.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare but life-threatening variant of psoriasis less responsive to conventional systemic therapies (CST). Limited research exists on the management of EP with secukinumab. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness, quality-of-life effects and safety of secukinumab versus CST in patients with EP. Methods: EP patients treated with either secukinumab or CST between August 2020 and October 2022 were identified using the National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID) database encompassing 962 healthcare organizations. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the cohorts based on demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed were Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scales at 4 weeks, 10-14 weeks, and 22-24 weeks. Results: The study included 311 patients (160 receiving secukinumab and 151 receiving CST), among them, 101 matched pairs were generated by propensity score matching (PSM). Secukinumab recipients displayed a notably accelerated response compared to those receiving CST, evidenced by significantly higher rates of achieving PASI50 (before PSM: 73.8% vs. 61.6%, after PSM: 76.2% vs. 63.4%), PASI90 (before PSM: 36.9% vs. 25.8%, after PSM: 40.6% vs. 25.7%), and BSA50 (before PSM: 64.4% vs. 50.3%, after PSM: 68.3% vs. 51.5%) at week 4 ( Conclusion: Compared to the CST, secukinumab tend to offer a more rapid response and achieve greater improvements in clinical symptoms and quality of life for EP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.