ReviewCureus2024
The Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing and Pain Management in Skin Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Photobiomodulation as a promising approach in the management of nipple lesions during breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Based OCT Segmentation for Stiffness Quantification in Evaluating Low-Level Laser Therapy for Wound Healing.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Trial
- Photobiomodulation for Pain, Healing, and Analgesic Use after Perineal Lacerations: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Optimisation of low-level light therapy (lllt) parameters and evaluation of its immunomodulatory effect on fibroblasts.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation and Low-Level Laser Therapy as Complementary Strategies in Diabetes Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Perineal Pain and Wound Healing After Episiotomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pain management in complex wounds: a scoping review and analysis using comfort theory.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Mapping Online Discourse on Topical Steroid Withdrawal: Accuracy, Safety, and Supporting Evidence.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Oral Mucosal Wound Healing and Systemic Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Rats: An In Vivo Experimental Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Donor Site Burn Wound Healing in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
- Photobiomodulation therapy.JADA foundational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive application of non-thermogenic light that is proven to promote tissue healing and alleviate pain. The authors aim to conduct the first meta-analysis, evaluating the effects of LLLT on wound healing and pain in skin wounds by comparing it to skin wounds not treated with LLLT. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed by searching the electronic databases. Eighteen randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Six hundred seventy skin wounds were analysed in the study. The primary outcome measures were the percentage reduction in wound size and the rate of complete wound healing. The secondary outcome measures included the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the perineal pain score in episiotomy wounds. The percentage reduction of wound size in the LLLT group was significantly greater than that in the control group (95% confidence interval, CI, 13.93-37.70; p < 0.0001). In addition, the rate of wound healing was significantly greater in the LLLT group (95% CI, 2.32-16.70; p = 0.0003). LLLT has been shown to reduce pain, with the VAS scores for pain being significantly lower in the LLLT group after treatment (95% CI, -2.52 to -0.19; p = 0.02). The authors present the first meta-analysis within the literature showing the effects of LLLT on wound healing and pain in skin wounds. Higher quality trials are recommended to enhance the current evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.