Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610643›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Difficult Intubation Alert Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Difficult Intubation.

Anna M Budde, Andrea L Barrett, Ashley C Benner, Lauren B Gunn-Sandell, Alexander M Kaizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna M BuddeAnesthesiology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA.
Andrea L BarrettOccupational Therapy, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA.
Ashley C BennerClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA.
Lauren B Gunn-SandellBiostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Alexander M KaizerBiostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDifficult or failed intubation significantly increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Documentation of a prior difficult or failed tracheal intubation is a strong predictor of future difficult intubation.

methodsWe undertook a quality improvement project to create a redesigned difficult intubation alert with increased visibility in our electronic health record. We sought to determine whether this redesigned alert would be associated with a reduced incidence of difficult intubations. After reviewing many intubation procedure notes, we chose the following criteria to define a predicted future difficult intubation: requiring an awake technique, ease of intubation procedure charted as "difficult" or "unable", procedure requiring flexible bronchoscopy, a procedure requiring three or more attempts, and intubation with a grade three or four view during laryngoscopy. Patients meeting one or more of the above criteria were included in our study. An intervention was implemented which consisted of the introduction of a new difficult intubation alert that could easily be applied to a patient's chart by anyone on the anesthesia team. Further, if the anesthesia clinician filling out the intubation procedure note charted an intubation procedure as "difficult" or "unable", they were prompted by a pop-up asking if difficult intubation should be added to the patient's problem list. If yes was clicked, the electronic alert was activated, and a large red banner appeared. Outcomes included the number of patients who had the difficult intubation label in the pre-intervention period, the number of patients who had the new difficult intubation alert in the post-intervention period, the number of records with ease of intubation procedure charted as "difficult" or "unable", the number of records requiring three or more attempts at intubation, and the number of records with grade three or four view charted at intubation.

resultsThere was an expected increase in the application of the difficult intubation alert from 9% of patients with a difficult intubation label in the pre-intervention period to 38% with the redesigned alert in the post-intervention period which was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the 21 months prior to the introduction of the alert, our screening process identified 988 records as predicted difficult intubations. Of these, 672 (68%) were charted by the intubating clinician as actual difficult intubations with 32% not being recorded as difficult. During the 20 months after the end of the interim period, the screening process identified 976 predicted difficult intubations with intubating anesthesia clinicians charting 416 (42%) of them as actual difficult intubations and 58% found not to be difficult. This reduction in monthly median percent of actual difficult intubations was statistically significant (p<0.001).

conclusionsThe introduction of a difficult intubation alert at our institution was associated with a reduced incidence of difficult intubation.

Indexed as

academic anesthesiologyanesthesia documentationdifficult airway intubationdifficult airway managementquality improvement project

Identifiers

PMID39610643
PMCPMC11604021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.