Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610640›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Unusual Clinical Presentation of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis and Its Response to Mepolizumab: Two Case Reports.

Mahmoud A Kiblawi, Talha Malik, Mazin M Edan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmoud A KiblawiInternal Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Talha MalikGastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Mazin M EdanInternal Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare digestive disorder that affects individuals of all ages, characterized by eosinophilic infiltration in the stomach and intestines. Various risk factors contribute to EGE, and its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. The definitive diagnosis relies on histological examination of the involved gastrointestinal (GI) tract, revealing evidence of eosinophilic infiltration. We present two case reports of young males diagnosed with EGE who achieved good outcomes with early management, including steroids and mepolizumab. The use of a biologic agent, anti-IL5, helped reduce the use of steroids and both patients were in complete remission based on GI symptom assessments. The clinical presentation of EGE is non-specific, which can make diagnosis challenging. Currently, there is no definitive consensus on the optimal treatment for EGE, and management remains primarily empirical. Limited data are available on EGE, and these cases may help provide additional insights into the diagnosis and management of this rare disease.

Indexed as

biologic agentseosinophilic gastrointestinal disordereosinophilic infiltratesgastro-intestinalil-5

Identifiers

PMID39610640
PMCPMC11602532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.