Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610621›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Implications of Lingual Orthodontics Compared to Conventional Orthodontics.

Sneha Nandakumar, Akshay Tandon, Deepak Chandrasekaran, Deenadayalan Purushothaman, Praveen Katepogu, Reshma Mohan, Nidhi Angrish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sneha NandakumarDental Surgery, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Akshay TandonOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Deepak ChandrasekaranOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Deenadayalan PurushothamanOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Praveen KatepoguOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Reshma MohanOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.
Nidhi AngrishOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In orthodontics, the treatment plan and the impact of orthodontic appliances on patients' aesthetic appearance have significantly influenced patients' aesthetic demands over time. Patients considering orthodontic treatment are very concerned about the potential compromise in facial appearance that conventional orthodontic treatment could cause. Lingual orthodontics offers an aesthetically pleasing appearance compared to conventional orthodontic systems, addressing the growing demand for inconspicuous treatment options. This review examines the implications of lingual orthodontics compared to conventional orthodontics, focusing on aesthetics, oral health outcomes, and patient satisfaction. The benefit of lingual brackets is that when positioned on the teeth's lingual surfaces, they are almost undetectable. However, they are associated with increased difficulty in oral hygiene maintenance due to their placement, leading to higher plaque accumulation that causes compromised periodontal health. Conversely, studies show a lower incidence of white spot lesions on lingual surfaces compared to buccal surfaces, suggesting a reduced risk of caries. Challenges with lingual systems include increased tongue discomfort and speech difficulties. Despite these challenges, lingual orthodontics demonstrates favourable outcomes for patients prioritising aesthetics. Future advancements should focus on improving appliance designs to enhance patient comfort and oral hygiene accessibility, ensuring optimal treatment outcomes. Interdisciplinary collaboration and comprehensive oral hygiene education are essential to maximise the benefits of lingual orthodontics.

Indexed as

aestheticsconventional orthodonticsinvisible bracketslingual orthodonticspatient compliance

Identifiers

PMID39610621
PMCPMC11604254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.