Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610599›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Mental Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Post-pandemic View From a Romanian Sample.

Adriana Mitrea, Anca Hăisan, Ani Cășărică, Rodica Gabriela Enache, Elena Danteș

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriana MitreaPulmonology Department, Constanta County Clinical Emergency Hospital 'St. Apostol Andrei', Faculty of Medicine, 'Ovidius' University, Constanța, ROU.
Anca HăisanEmergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, 'Grigore T Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, ROU.
Ani CășăricăPsychology Department, County Center for Resources and Educational Assistance, Constanța, ROU.
Rodica Gabriela EnacheFaculty of Psychology, 'Ovidius' University, Constanța, ROU.
Elena DanteșFaculty of Medicine, 'Ovidius' University, Constanta, ROU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe enduring psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to affect individuals long after the immediate health concerns have subsided. This research aims to identify specific groups within the Romanian population who are at a higher risk of experiencing mental health challenges that can interfere with everyday life and may lead to more serious mental health disorders.

methodsConducted as a cross-sectional survey, this study assessed the severity of psychological distress using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire in relation to COVID-19-related information and socio-demographic data to investigate the factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania.

resultsAnalysis of 521 questionnaires, filled out by a predominantly middle-aged cohort of 320 women and 201 men (mean age = 42.24, SD = 11.96), revealed that 63.72% of participants worked outside the healthcare field. Those unemployed or retired reported significantly higher anxiety levels than individuals in other sectors. Moreover, living alone, experiencing the loss of close relatives (6.14%) or friends (33.59%), and undergoing hospitalization or reinfection due to COVID-19 were linked to significantly elevated distress scores.

conclusionBy identifying the segments of the population most vulnerable to psychological distress, as evidenced by higher scores among the unemployed, retirees, individuals living alone, and those directly affected by COVID-19 through personal health or loss, targeted initiatives for psychological screening and therapy can be established. Such measures are essential for enhancing the post-pandemic mental well-being of Romanians, addressing the specific needs uncovered in this study. These findings are limited by the study type and sample size; therefore, more extensive, longitudinal research conducted on a larger population sample is necessary.

Indexed as

anxietycovid-19covid-19 reinfectioncross-sectionaldass-21depressionmental healthpsychological distressromanian populationstress

Identifiers

PMID39610599
PMCPMC11604092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.