ReviewCureus2024
Cardiovascular Findings in Klippel-Feil Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Klippel-Feil syndrome revealed by post-traumatic neck pain: Case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is a congenital disease defined by an abnormal fusion between cervical vertebrae. Due to the rarity of the disorder, its prevalence, along with its pathogenesis and associated conditions, remains to be clearly defined. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings of all case reports of KFS in PubMed over the last 10 years that describe cardiovascular disease, defects, or abnormalities. A total of 43 articles containing 46 reports were included from the 157 case reports considered. Cases were reviewed for commonality in biological sex and vertebral fusion and level using the Samartzis classification system to determine what association, if any, exists with the cardiovascular findings analyzed. A total of 72% of cases reported one or more findings consistent with congenital heart disease. Using the Samartzis classification system, type III KFS was the most common fusion profile overall in this subset of patients. The heterogeneity of disease manifestations makes the treatment and management of KFS case-dependent, though current guidelines highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary care team for pediatric patients. Our findings support this notion and provide evidence for the inclusion of a care provider who specializes in cardiovascular medicine in patients of all ages, as well as the consideration of additional diagnostic screening exams for cardiovascular abnormalities. Future studies into the embryological origin of KFS and a more robust search for a genetic marker are needed to better understand the development of the disease and its various associated conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.