ArticleCureus2024
Early Functional Outcomes and Complications of the First Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhizarthrosis is accompanied by decreased mobility, poor grip, and progressive pain. Surgical treatment, which involves various techniques, is the only definitive solution sparing the joint. First carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty helps reduce the discomfort associated with rhizarthrosis and restores joint function. From 2020 to the end of March 2024, 35 arthroplasties of the first CMC joint have been performed. In this study, the implant survival was recorded at a five-year follow-up. Evaluation of functional outcomes was conducted using preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS), and Kapandji scores. Two types of implants were used, and their postoperative DASH and Kapandji scores were compared. The one-year implant survival was 0.97, and the three-year implant survival was 0.86. Range of motion showed significant improvement in patients after the first CMC arthroplasty. The VAS score, which assesses pain, and the DASH score, used to subjectively assess upper extremity disability, showed similar postoperative improvement. There is no significant difference in postoperative outcomes (DASH score and Kapandji score) between the "standard" and "dual mobility" implant types when evaluating postoperative outcomes. One intraoperative and two postoperative complications were observed in this study. First CMC joint arthroplasty effectively relieves pain, improves range of motion, and enhances functional outcomes in patients with rhizarthrosis. Both implant types demonstrated similar postoperative results in terms of DASH and Kapandji scores. While the study observed a few complications, the overall results support the efficacy of first CMC joint arthroplasty as a reliable treatment option for restoring joint function and reducing pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.