ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2024
The effect of self-care training based on e-learning and teach-back methods on the performance of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effect of Insulin Pen Training Using the Teach-Back Method on Diabetes Self-Management, Quality of Life, and HbA1c Levels in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the chronic nature of the diabetes, patients who suffer from this disease need education to take care of themselves and increase self-care. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the effect of e-learning and teach-back methods on the performance of diabetic patients. Methods: In this study, 144 patients with type 2 diabetes were selected based on purposive sampling. Considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the subjects were divided into two groups of intervention (n = 48) and control (n = 48) by simple randomization. The two intervention groups included the e-learning group whose subjects were trained by entering the training site for three months and the teach-back group whose subjects were trained during four 60-minute sessions for three months. The control group was followed up according to routine care. Before and one month after the intervention, data were collected using self-care questionnaires in the areas of knowledge and performance based on interviews and blood glucose tests and self-reporting. The data were analyzed using SPSS 21 and statistical tests of ANOVA, independent t and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: The results showed that both e-learning (P = 0.001) and teach-back training (P = 0.008) methods were associated with a significant increase in self-care compared to before the intervention, but only in the teach-back group, this increase was significant compared to control group(P = 0.002) and the training methods showed no significant effect on blood sugar level and BMI of the patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that both electronic and teach-back training methods have been effective on the level of self-care of diabetic patients. However, the teach-back method had a greater impact on the level of self-care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.