Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610481›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2024

A new glucose monitoring system for the intermittent monitoring of interstitial glucose values in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Antonio Rossi, Giada Rossi, Laura Montefusco, Vincenzo Cimino, Ida Pastore, Alessandra Gandolfi, Loredana Bucciarelli, Cristian Loretelli, Denisa Boci, Francesca D'Addio and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Randomized Study of theJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Antonio RossiI.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8660-2146
Giada RossiDept. Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-4725
Laura MontefuscoDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2096-8188
Vincenzo CiminoDept. Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-3377
Ida PastoreDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0164-3772
Alessandra GandolfiDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-3363
Loredana BucciarelliDept. Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-6529
Cristian LoretelliDept. Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-8540
Denisa BociDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Francesca D'AddioDept. Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-0694
Maria Elena LunatiDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3619-3046
Paolo FiorinaDivision of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-7724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Glucose monitoring in diabetes is changing overtime with a constant development of new devices for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Aim of this observational, prospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel intermittently scanned CGM system, the Glunovo Flash in a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A total of 45 patients with T1D followed at the Endocrinology Unit of the ASST-FBF-Sacco (Milan) were enrolled. All patients were habitual CGM users and were asked to wear simultaneously the Glunovo Flash system and their habitual CGM device for 14 days. A comparison of CGM glucose metrics was performed. Patients' opinions on the new device were also collected. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the study period of two weeks (7 habitual real time CGM users, 28 habitual intermittently scanned CGM users). Mean Time In Range resulted significantly higher with the novel studied sensor respect to intermittently scanned CGM comparator. No differences were found considering other glucose metrics. A positive correlation was found between the Time In Range recorded by Glunovo Flash and intermittently scanned CGM comparators as well as for Time Above Range, Glucose Management Indicator, Time Below Range and Coefficient of Variation. No correlations were found between glucose metrics recorded by Glunovo Flash and real time CGM comparators. Patients reported a positive experience of use with the new sensor but some elements appeared improvable. Conclusions: The CGM device Glunovo Flash for patients with diabetes shows similar performance to other intermittently scanned CGM systems.

Indexed as

Continuous glucose monitoringDevice satisfaction type 1 diabetesDiabetes management systemFlash glucose monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39610481
PMCPMC11599681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.