Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities: toward a mental model of the consequences of kinship intensity.

Kuang-Hui Yeh, Jane Terpstra Tong, Rachel Sing-Kiat Ting, Michael Harris Bond, Meetu Khosla, Virendra Pratap Yadav, Shashwat Shukla, Charles Liu, Louise Sundararajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kuang-Hui YehAcademia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jane Terpstra TongSchool of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Rachel Sing-Kiat TingDepartment of Psychology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Michael Harris BondDepartment of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Meetu KhoslaDepartment of Psychology, Daulat Ram College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Virendra Pratap YadavDepartment of Applied Psychology, Shyama Prasad Mukherji College for Women, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Shashwat ShuklaDepartment of Management, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India.
Charles LiuSchool of Psychology, Counseling, and Family Therapy, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, United States.
Louise SundararajanIndependent Researcher, Rochester, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence of the connection between variations in kinship intensity and cross-cultural differences in psychological traits. Contributing to this literature on kinship intensity, we put forward a mental model to explain the enduring connection between ancestral niche and psychological traits. Our model posits that two primary orientations or dispositions-strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities-have co-evolved with our ancestral niches to perpetuate-by internalizing and reproducing-the social structure (such as preferences for certain attitudes, values, and beliefs) of the ancestral niche. The findings from 1,291 participants across four societies-China, India, Taiwan, and the United States-support our hypothesis that strong-ties (weak-ties) rationalities, when activated, will endorse strong-tie (weak-ties) values and beliefs. This proposed model contributes to the toolbox of cultural and cross-cultural psychology in a twofold sense: First, in addition to the index of kinship intensity, it offers a measure of kin-based rationality as another predictor of psychological traits; second, it renders intelligible the niche and rationality disconnect prevalent in the globalizing era.

Indexed as

ecological nichehabituskinship intensityrationalitystrong ties and weak tiesvalues and beliefs

Identifiers

PMID39610448
PMCPMC11603357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.