ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Effect of whole-day work on surgical performance during simulated laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a controlled cross over laboratory trial.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a full clinical workday on surgical performance in simulated laparoscopy: a controlled crossover trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Electromyography in abdominal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparison of robotic and manual scope holders in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopy has become a fundamental aspect of surgery, presenting new challenges such as fatigue, encompassing both muscular and cognitive components. Given its potential to affect surgical precision and create difficulties for the surgeon, it is crucial to study the mechanisms of fatigue for patient safety and the well-being of surgeons. This study aims to demonstrate the influence of general fatigue on surgeons' performance, incorporating assessments of movement quality through balance, kinematics, and muscle activation, as well as perceived workload. Additionally, the study seeks to evaluate how surgeons' experience may affect fatigue outcomes. Methods and analysis: A controlled cross-over laboratory trial involving 29 residents and surgeons from the obstetrics and gynecology department of Nantes University Hospital is underway. Recruitment started in March 2023 and ended in September 2023. Participants with varying levels of experience perform two one-hour sessions of training box exercises, one in the morning (control condition) and the other at the end of a workday. The primary outcome is a composite score derived from the time to complete the Suturing and Knot Tying Training and Testing (SUTT) exercise, along with the number and quality of stitches. Secondary outcomes include perceived fatigue, discomfort, physical strain, muscle tension, mental workload, muscle activation (measured by surface electromyography), balance (measured using a force platform), and kinematics (measured using motion capture). Ethics and dissemination: The study received ethical approval from the local ethics committee CERNI in December 2022 (n°13,122,022). Results will be presented in international conferences, submitted to peer-reviewed journals, and serve as a feasibility study for subsequent publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.