Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Comparative analysis of volatility forecasting for healthcare stock indices amid public health crises: a study based on the Bayes-CNN model.

Yanguo Li, Ruitao Gu, Dezhi Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanguo LiSchool of Economics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Ruitao GuSchool of Finance, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Dezhi ZhaoSchool of Economics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, public health events have significantly impacted various aspects of human production and daily life, particularly in the domains of disease transmission and economic stability. While many scholars have primarily focused on the influence of public health events from the perspective of disease prevention and control, research examining their economic implications, especially regarding public health indices in the securities market, remains relatively scarce. Such studies are crucial for ensuring public health safety and stability. This paper employs the Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network (Bayes-CNN) model to predict financial market volatility influenced by public health events and conducts a comparative analysis. To validate the feasibility of this method, the model is used to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CSI (China Securities Index) Medical Service Index. The results indicate significant differences in the volatility of the CSI Medical Service Index before and after the outbreak, particularly during the pandemic period. This study also enhances the validity and reliability of its conclusions by incorporating European data and employing the GARCH model. Relevant institutions and individual investors should adopt different regulatory and investment strategies based on the specifics of various public health events to prevent the outbreak of systemic financial risks that could affect social stability. This paper offers a new perspective and methodology for predicting financial market volatility under the influence of public health events, providing valuable insights for investors and decision-makers to better understand and respond to the potential impacts of such events on financial markets.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCOVID-19ForecastingInvestmentsNeural Networks, ComputerPublic HealthChinaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Bayes-CNN modelcomparative analysishealthcare stock indicespublic health crisesvolatility forecasting

Identifiers

PMID39610390
PMCPMC11602464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.