ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2024
CMR and adverse clinical outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy and lactation as window to maternal cardiovascular health.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Peripartum cardiomyopathy in an intensive care unit setting.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent studies show recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can still be associated with longitudinal adverse clinical outcomes. Cardiac MRI (CMR) may yield additional prognostic parameters of serious adverse outcomes (SAE) beyond LVEF. Methods: Individuals with PPCM and CMR within 3 months of diagnosis were analyzed from the Investigations in Pregnancy Associated Cardiomyopathy (IPAC) trial and our institution from 2010-present. Indexed left ventricular (LV) mass, ventricular volumes, cardiac output, global longitudinal strain (GLS), extracellular cellular volume (ECV) as well as epicardial fat volume (EFV) were analyzed. SAEs included left ventricular assist device (LVAD), heart transplant and death. CMR parameters were compared between SAE and no SAEs groups by non-parametric techniques. Results: Among 51 individuals with mean age of 31 years at diagnosis, 6/51 (12 %) experienced 11 adverse outcomes. EF at time of CMR (15.0 vs 37.3 %, Conclusion: Prior studies found baseline LVEF by echo is a predictor of serious adverse outcomes. CMR identified significantly different baseline LVESVi peak LV GLS and ECV among PPCM with SAEs vs no SAEs. If confirmed in larger studies, diffuse myocardial fibrosis may represent a therapeutic target in PPCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.