ArticleCancer medicine2024
Therapy and Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the French Society of Pediatric Oncology Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor Committee.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma: treatment recommendations from the European pediatric soft tissue sarcoma study group (EpSSG).British journal of cancer · 2025Guideline
- Sinonasal Sarcomas Management: An International Consensus Statement.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis for patients with relapse of localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) remains poor, with limited evidence for optimal second-line therapy. This study describes the management and outcomes of relapsed RMS patients in France.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all nonmetastatic RMS patients enrolled in France in the RMS 2005 study who relapsed between 2006 and 2019 after achieving complete local control, defined as complete remission or stable residue ≥ 6 months after treatment completion. Data were extracted from the RMS 2005 database and medical records.
resultsNinety-five patients relapsed at a median age of 6.0 years (range: 1.0-27.0). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 17.5 months (range: 7.4-82.0). Most patients had embryonal RMS (65.3%) and local/locoregional relapses (71.6%). The first relapse treatment included chemotherapy (all except two patients), radiotherapy (52.6%), and surgery (48.4%). Second-line chemotherapy yielded a 58.5% objective response rate after 3 ± 1 cycles. Fifty-five patients achieved second complete remission. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years from the first relapse (range: 0.3-11.3), 5-year progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI: 18-36), and 5-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI: 25-45). Importantly, no patient survived relapse without receiving locoregional treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy).
conclusionThis study confirmed the inconsistencies in therapy and the poor prognosis for relapsed RMS but highlighted the potential for long-term survival in patients who received surgery and/or radiotherapy, emphasizing the crucial role of achieving local control in improving outcomes at relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.