Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610268›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025

Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss.

Daniel B Hoffman, Albino G Schifino, Marion A Cooley, Roger X Zhong, Junwon Heo, Courtney M Morris, Matthew J Campbell, Gordon L Warren, Sarah M Greising, Jarrod A Call

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel B HoffmanSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Albino G SchifinoDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Marion A CooleyDepartment of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, August University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Roger X ZhongDepartment of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Junwon HeoDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Courtney M MorrisDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Matthew J CampbellDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Gordon L WarrenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sarah M GreisingSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9285-4908
Jarrod A CallDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1094-4940

Funding

Pathological Foundations of Skeletal Muscle After Volumetric Muscle Loss and Targets For RehabilitationR01AR078903 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CALL, JARROD A, GREISING, SARAH M · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
Age, Injury, and the Neuromuscular JunctionK02AG081488 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Sarah M Greising · 2023 to 2026
$606k
Skyscan 1272 micro-CT systemS10OD025177 · OD · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI ELSALANTY, MOHAMMED ELSAYED HASSAN · 2018 to 2018
$368k
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs W81XWH-20-10885NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078903NIA NIH HHS K02 AG081488NIH HHS S10 OD025177NIH HHS S10OD025177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's objective was to investigate the extent to which two different levels of low-intensity vibration training (0.6 g or 1.0 g) affected musculoskeletal structure and function after a volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury in male C57BL/6J mice. All mice received a unilateral VML injury to the posterior plantar flexors. Mice were randomized into a control group (no vibration; VML-noTX), or one of two experimental groups. The two experimental groups received vibration training for 15-min/day, 5-days/week for 8 weeks at either 0.6 g (VML-0.6 g) or 1.0 g (VML-1.0 g) beginning 3-days after induction of VML. Muscles were analyzed for contractile and metabolic adaptations. Tibial bone mechanical properties and geometric structure were assessed by a three-point bending test and microcomputed tomography (µCT). Body mass-normalized peak isometric-torque was 18% less in VML-0.6 g mice compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.030). There were no statistically significant differences of vibration intervention on contractile power or muscle oxygen consumption (p ≥ 0.191). Bone ultimate load, but not stiffness, was ~16% greater in tibias of VML-1.0 g mice compared with those from VML-noTx mice (p = 0.048). Cortical bone volume was ~12% greater in tibias of both vibration groups compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.003). Importantly, cross-section moment of inertia, the primary determinant of bone ultimate load, was 44% larger in tibias of VML-0.6 g mice compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.006). These changes indicate that following VML, bones are more responsive to the selected vibration training parameters than muscle. Vibration training represents a possible adjuvant intervention to address bone deficits following VML.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalVibrationAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTibiabone weaknessmitochondriamuscle injuryrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39610268
PMCPMC11806655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.