ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2025
A multivariate study on the effect of 3D printing parameters on the printability of gluten-free composite dough.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extrusion-Based 3D Food Printing of Gluten-Free Quinoa Biscuits: Formulation and Printing Parameter Optimization.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Protein Fortification of Millet-Based Gluten-Free Snacks Designed for 3D Printing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe advancement of three-dimensional (3D) food printing technology is significantly influencing the food processing industry. The present study utilized extrusion 3D printing to create a gluten-free dough composed of little millet flour (LMF), amaranth seed flour (ASF) and curry leaf flour (CLF). The primary objective was to elucidate the effects of various extrusion-based 3D printing conditions, including extruder nozzle diameter (ND), extrusion rate (ER), print speed (PS) and layer height (LH) on the printability parameters of the dough.
resultsIn this study, three formulations of composite dough were prepared (i.e., S1, S2 and S3) by varying LMF, ASF and CLF compositions; among which S1 composite (LMF:ASF:CLF::30:60:10 w/w) was found to have comparable viscoelastic properties with the wheat dough. Central composite design (CCD) was selected with 30 experimental runs and 3D dough samples were printed using S1 composite by varying ND, ER, PS and LH. Principal component analysis of the printed samples accounted for 82.75% of variability and classified the samples into three confidence ellipses. From the results of the CCD model, four solution parameters in terms of ND:ER:PS:LH::mm: pulse μL
conclusionThe present study provides parametric solutions for efficient 3D printing of gluten-free composite dough, aligning with the increasing dietary preferences and demand of novel functional customized foods. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.