ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Effects of Nutritional Protocol Changes on Hemodialysis Adequacy and Patient Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, strict feeding restrictions were implemented in many dialysis centers to minimize transmission between patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these feeding restrictions on dry weight, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective single-center study involving 76 hemodialysis patients, data from 2 consecutive 6-month periods were analyzed: the first before the COVID-19 pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was supported, and the second during the pandemic when intradialytic nutrition was restricted. Data from the patients' monthly visits during both periods were evaluated, averages were recorded, and a comparison was made between the 2 periods. RESULTS The frequency of IDH was significantly higher during the feeding period compared with the no-feeding period (1.4±1.2/month vs 0.81±0.86/month, P=0.01). Conversely, the urea reduction ratio was greater in the no-feeding period [72.5% (69-76) vs 71% (68-75), P=0.01], as were the single-pool Kt/V values (1.59±0.23 vs 1.52±0.26, P=0.004) and ultrafiltration rates (mL/h/kg) (11.4±3.0 vs 10.4±3.2, P=0.01). However, the dry weight of the patients was similar in the 2 periods (65.4±13.7 kg vs 65.7±14.2 kg, P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, mandatory feeding restrictions for hemodialysis patients, aimed at reducing transmission, were linked to a decrease in IDH frequency and improved dialysis adequacy. However, no significant reduction in patients' dry weights was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.