ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2024
Application value of generative artificial intelligence in the field of stomatology.
Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to compare and analyze three types of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and explore their application value and existing problems in the field of stomatology in the Chinese context.
methodsA total of 36 questions were designed, covering all the professional areas of stomatology. The questions encompassed various aspects including medical records, professional knowledge, and translation and editing. These questions were submitted to ChatGPT4-turbo, Gemini (2024.2) and ERNIE Bot 4.0. After obtaining the answers, a blinded evaluation was conducted by three experienced oral medicine physicians using a four-point Likert scale. The value of GAI in various application scenarios was evaluated.
resultsGemini scored 45, ERNIE Bot scored 38, and ChatGPT scored 33 for clinical documentation and image production. For research assistance, Gemini achieved 45, ERNIE Bot had 39, and ChatGPT scored 35. Teaching assistance capabilities were rated at 54 for ERNIE Bot, 50 for Gemini, and 48 for ChatGPT. In patient consultation and guidance, Gemini scored 78, ERNIE Bot scored 59, and ChatGPT scored 48. Overall, the total scores were 218, 190, and 164 for Gemini, ERNIE Bot, and ChatGPT, respectively. Among GAI applications, the top scoring categories were article translation and polishing (26), patient-doctor communication documentation (23), and popular science content creation (23). The lowest scoring categories were literature search and reporting (13) and image generation (12).
conclusionsIn the Chinese context, the application value of GAI is the highest for Gemini, followed by ERNIE Bot and ChatGPT. GAI shows significant value in translation, patient-doctor communication, and popular science writing. However, its value in literature search, reporting, and image generation remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.