Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610078›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2024

Application of intraoral scanning registration implant robot in dental implant surgery.

Nenghao Jin, Bo Qiao, Liang Zhu, Fanhao Meng, Quanquan Lin, Liangbo Li, Lejun Xing, Rui Zhao, Haizhong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Research progress on the diagnosis of ectodermal dysplasia and early oral prosthodontic treatment].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. [Application and prospect of digital technology in endodontic microsurgery].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nenghao JinDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Bo QiaoDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Liang ZhuDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Fanhao MengChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China.
Quanquan LinChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China.
Liangbo LiDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Lejun XingDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Rui ZhaoChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China.
Haizhong ZhangDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper aims to investigate the application of intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration implant robot in dental implant surgery.

methodsThe data of 40 cases with dental defect of robot-assisted implantation from November 2023 to May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Before the operation, the intraoral scan data and CBCT data of the positioning markers were automatically fused with the initial CBCT images, and the registration error was calculated. The average registration error of positioning markers was determined during the operation, and the implantation accuracy was analyzed after the operation.

resultsThe intraoral scan data and CBCT data of 40 patients with dental defect wearing positioning markers were successfully registered with the initial CBCT image, and the registration errors were (0.157±0.026) mm and (0.154±0.033) mm, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no statistical significance between them. The registration errors of the marker was (0.037 3±0.003 6) mm. A total of 55 implants were performed, and the total deviations of the implant point and the apical point were (0.78±0.41) and (0.89±0.28) mm, respectively. The transverse deviations of the implant point and the apical point were (0.44±0.36) and (0.58±0.25) mm, respectively. The depth deviations of the implant point and the apical point were (0.51±0.32) and (0.54±0.36) mm, respectively. The deviation of the implant angle was 1.24°±0.67°.

conclusionsThe fusion technology based on intraoral scanning and CBCT registration can meet the accuracy requirements of preoperative registration of oral implant robots. The technology increases the choice of registration methods before robot-assisted dental implant surgery and reduces the multiple radiation exposuresof the patient.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ImplantsDental ImplantationHumansRetrospective StudiesRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedDental Implantscomputer-aided designdental implantintraoral scanningrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39610078
PMCPMC11669928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.