ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024
The role of artificial intelligence in immune checkpoint inhibitor research: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in immune checkpoint inhibitor research: A bibliometric analysis of the landscape.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Predictive Biomarkers in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Narrative Review Across Selected Solid Tumors.Cureus · 2025Review
- Exploring the Emerging Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the development of vaccines and immunotherapeutics-yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are revolutionizing cancer treatment, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a key player in this field. A comprehensive analysis of AI's impact on these inhibitors was lacking, but this study addresses that by analyzing literature for trends and future predictions. It reveals rapid growth and international collaboration. We utilized analytical tools such as CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and PlotDB to analyze 774 documents from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2018 to May 2024, discovering a steady increase in annual publications, with China and the United States leading the way. Sun Yat Sen University and researchers like Ock Chan-young, Zhang Hao, and Newman AM are prominent. The most productive journal is Frontiers in Immunology, while the New England Journal of Medicine has the highest citation rate. The most cited reference is Newman, AM's 2019 article in Nature Biotechnology. Keywords like "immunotherapy," "pembrolizumab," "cancer," "machine learning," and "expression" are central to the discourse. Research focuses on the application of inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer, bioinformatics, and cancer immunotherapy, showing AI's potential to improve oncology precision medicine. Although AI's application in ICIs shows promise, significant challenges still demand exploration and resolution. Continued investment in AI research in this context could lead to significant advancements in cancer treatment. Global collaboration is needed to overcome these challenges and fully leverage AI's potential. This study provides a foundation for future research and interdisciplinary collaboration in this critical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.