ArticleBMC nutrition2024
Nutritional status as a predictor of 30-day mortality among intensive care unit patients in sub-Saharan Africa: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Nutritional status and clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.Metabolism open · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of the National Early Warning Score Combined with Nutritional and Endothelial Stress Indices for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition is a major public health issue, causing significant mortality and morbidity, especially in developing nations. However, the magnitude and its impact on clinical outcomes in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients need to be investigated better in Sub-Saharan Africa, and this study was intended to address these issues.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the effect of malnutrition on clinical outcomes among ICU patients.
methodA prospective cohort study was conducted among 436 ICU patients, 218 of whom were malnourished. After obtaining ethical approval, malnourished and well-nourished patients were followed for thirty days to examine the effects of nutritional status on clinical outcomes and its determinants. At admission, nutritional screening and evaluation were performed with Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and during the next thirty days, it was evaluated every seven days with SGA, MUST, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC).
resultThis study demonstrated that the incidence of 30-day mortality was 47.9%( 95% CI: 43.2 to 52.6). The hazards of death in patients with malnutrition increased by 40% as compared to well-nourished patients (aHR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.56), and patients with diabetes mellitus had 4 times the hazards of death (aHR = 4.2, 95% CI: 2.12 to 8.28).
conclusionMalnutrition is prevalent in adult ICU patients and has been linked to a higher 30-day mortality and a more extended ICU stay. MUST, SGA, and NUTRIC, well-validated, practical, cost-effective, and non-invasive techniques for routinely evaluating nutritional status in critically ill patients, were good predictors of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.