ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024
"I just don't know enough": Australian perspectives on community involvement in health and medical research.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meaningful engagement of lived experience in diabetes research and health service improvement: A rapid review of barriers to and enablers for community involvement among adults with type 2 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- Who CaREs - We do: Development of a community and researcher engagement program in translational medicine.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- The expanding global genomics landscape: Converging priorities from national genomics programs.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Translational Genomics and Community-Driven Research in Australia.Ethics & human researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing global support from governments and other funding bodies for community involvement in research, alongside a scientific and moral imperative for responsible and ethical research practice. Ninety per cent of Australian patient-led organisations in rare diseases have clearly articulated research priorities, indicating a desire among people affected by disease to be involved in research that impacts their communities. Philanthropic research, which is likely to have predominantly community-minded priorities, is worth over AU$1 billion annually and increased more than 100% between 2007 and 2017.
aimsThis research aimed to understand public perspectives on community involvement in health-related research activities, and to inform the development of guidelines for genomic researchers to improve this involvement.
methodsA 37-question survey was completed by 1,156 members of the Australian public via Dynata. The survey was co-designed by the Involve Australia Working Group of community members within Australian Genomics. Results from 1156 responses were analysed.
resultsKey themes emerging from the survey data that impact potential involvement were low community confidence to contribute, a limited understanding of community involvement, roles and recognition, trust and governance of data, perceived trustworthiness of research funders, and factors related to time and personal resources. A variety of motivations for involvement were also stated.
conclusionMembers of the Australian public are interested in research involvement; however the differences between involvement and participation are poorly understood and a variety of barriers still exist. Researchers must actively reach out into communities and offer opportunities to engage with research and identify community priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.