ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024
Aggregation of cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of 40-year-olds participating in a population-based health screening program in Sweden.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is important to identify and evaluate cardiovascular risk factors at an early stage to address them accordingly. Among the younger population, the metabolic syndrome is less common than in older ages. However, each separate metabolic risk factor still has an additive effect on cardiovascular risk factor burden. Non-metabolic risk factors that occur in the younger population include family history, smoking, psychological distress and socioeconomic vulnerability. In 2021 a voluntary health intervention program was introduced in an urban area in Sweden where a cohort of 40-year-olds was invited for cardiovascular risk identification. The aim of this study was to identify how cardiovascular risk factors tend to aggregate in individuals participating in a voluntary health screening program and how the metabolic risk factors associate with non-metabolic cardiovascular risk factors.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with 1831 participants. Data from questionnaires and baseline measurements were used to calculate the prevalence of metabolic- (blood pressure, lipids, fasting plasma glucose, BMI, waist-hip ratio) and non-metabolic risk factors (family history of CVD, smoking, psychological distress, socioeconomic vulnerability) for CVD. SCORE2 was calculated according to the algorithm provided by the SCORE2 working group and ESC (European Society of Cardiology) Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration. Associations among each of the metabolic risk factors and non-metabolic risk factors were estimated using logistic regression and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsMore than half of the study population had at least one metabolic risk factor, and more than 1/3 was considered to be suffering from psychological distress. Furthermore, obesity or central obesity demonstrated individual associations with all of the non-metabolic risk factors in the study; smoking (1.49; 1.32-2.63), family history of CVD (1.41; 1.14-1.73), socioeconomic vulnerability (1.60; 1.24-2.07), and psychological distress (1.40; 1.14-1.72). According to SCORE2 25% of the men were at moderate risk (2.5-7.5%) of developing a cardiovascular event within 5-10 years, but only 2% of the women.
conclusionsObesity/central obesity should be a prioritized target in health screening programs. The non-metabolic risk factors, socioeconomic vulnerability, and psychological distress should not be ignored and addressed with adequate guidance to create health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.