ArticleVirology journal2024
Obtaining HBV core protein VLPs carrying SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid conserved fragments as vaccine candidates.
Article in Virology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic adjuvants: A paradigm shift in vaccine development and immune modulation.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) has been used as a carrier of several heterologous protein fragments based on its capacity to form virus-like particles (VLPs) and to activate innate and adaptive immune responses. In the present work, two chimeric proteins were designed as potential pancorona vaccine candidates, comprising the N- or C- terminal domain of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein fused to HBcAg. The recombinant proteins, obtained in E. coli, were named CN-1 and CND-1, respectively. The final protein preparations were able to form 10-25 nm particles, visualized by TEM. Both proteins were recognized by sera from COVID-19 convalescent donors; however, the antigenicity of CND-1 tends to be higher. The immunogenicity of both proteins was studied in Balb/C mice by intranasal route without adjuvant. After three doses, only CND-1 elicited a positive immune response, systemic and mucosal, against SARS-CoV-2 N protein. CND-1 was evaluated in a second experiment mixed with the CpG ODN-39 M as nasal adjuvant. The induced anti-N immunity was significantly enhanced, and the antibodies generated were cross-reactive with N protein from Omicron variant, and SARS-CoV-1. Also, an anti-N broad cellular immune response was detected in spleen, by IFN-γ ELISpot. The nasal formulation composed by CND-1 and ODN-39 M constitutes an attractive component for a second generation coronavirus vaccine, increasing the scope of S protein-based vaccines, by inducing mucosal immunity and systemic broad humoral and cellular responses against Sarbecovirus N protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.