ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2024
International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07563842 (Expert Consensus On Definitions And Management Of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension And Abdominal Compartment Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Expert Consensus On Definitions And Management Of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension And Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perfusion Pressure Deficits as Early Indicators of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Neonatal Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of an Integrated Early Enteral Nutrition Management Protocol on Nutritional Target Attainment in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Guided by the MRC Framework.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Agreement between intra-bladder and insufflation pressure readings during laparoscopic surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis complicating sepsis and abdominal compartment syndrome.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Comparison of dexmedetomidine, haloperidol, and propofol sedation on intra-abdominal pressure, inflammatory response, and clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal sepsis: A randomised controlled study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Radiologic evaluation of abdominal compartment syndrome: an updated educational review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Advancements in research on feeding intolerance to enteral nutrition in neurocritical patients undergoing sedation and analgesia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Intra-abdominal pressure and procalcitonin for prognosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: An etiology-based analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Heart failure subphenotypes based on mean arterial pressure trajectory identify patients at increased risk of acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Variation and accuracy of intra-abdominal pressure measurement in different body positions: a prospective study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Behaviour and cognition of adult critical care nurses regarding intra-abdominal pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Acute Compartment Syndrome and Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Decompression, Current Pharmacotherapy, and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Solution.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) established consensus definitions and recommendations for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2006, and they were last updated in 2013. The WSACS conducted an international survey between 2022 and 2023 to seek the agreement of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worldwide on current and new candidate statements that may be used for future guidelines.
methodsA self-administered, online cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the WSACS to assess the level of agreement among HCPs over current and new candidate statements. The survey, distributed electronically worldwide, collected agreement or disagreement with statements on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), pathophysiology, definitions, and management of IAH/ACS. Statistical analysis assessed agreement levels, expressed in percentages, on statements among respondents, and comparisons between groups were performed according to the respondent's education status, base specialty, duration of work experience, role (intensivist vs non-intensivist) and involvement in previous guidelines. Agreement was considered to be reached when 80% or more of the respondents agreed with a particular statement.
resultsA total of 1042 respondents from 102 countries, predominantly physicians (73%), of whom 48% were intensivists, participated. Only 59% of HCPs were aware of the 2013 WSACS guidelines, and 41% incorporated them into practice. Despite agreement in most statements, significant variability existed. Notably, agreement was not reached on four new candidate statements: "normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is 10 mmHg in critically ill adults" (77%), "clinical assessment and estimation of IAP is inaccurate" (65.2%), "intragastric can be an alternative to the intravesical route for IAP measurement" (70.4%), and "measurement of IAP should be repeated in the resting position after measurement in a supine position" (71.9%). The survey elucidated nuances in clinical practice and highlighted areas for further education and standardization.
conclusionMore than ten years after the last published guidelines, this worldwide cross-sectional survey collected feedback and evaluated the level of agreement with current recommendations and new candidate statements. This will inform the consensus process for future guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.