ArticleBMC research notes2024
Perceptions of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care.
Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding care to trauma patients in pre-hospital emergencies is a vital and life-sustaining factor for individuals. This study was conducted to percept of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care.
methodsThis qualitative study was done using a conventional content analysis method that employed purposive sampling technique. A total of 12 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 operational staff members of pre-hospital emergency services from May 2021 to September 2022. After recording and transcribing the data, qualitative content analysis, based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach, was performed on the data.
resultsFrom the data analysis, a total of 478 initial codes were extracted, leading to the identification of two main categories, namely "Stress as an Unavoidable Factor" and "Emotional Impasse". The first category included three sub-categories of work under stress, associating your family in the face of life-threatening conditions, and worrying about the patient's fate. Three sub-categories of a long-term mental occupation of the technician with the encounter scene, the feeling of guilt despite trying as much as possible, and emotional distress in certain groups emerged from the second category.
conclusions"Stress as an Unavoidable Factor" and "Emotional Impasse" have been introduced as main categories of perceptions of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.