ArticleBMC medical education2024
Novel indigenous low cost (NICA) model for hands on training of surgical interns in incision and drainage procedure for superficial skin abscess.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical education necessitates hands-on training, which poses ethical challenges when practicing on real patients. Simulation training emerges as a pivotal solution, offering a safe and effective environment for skill acquisition. However, existing simulation models often overlook common surgical conditions like superficial skin abscesses. The National Medical Commission advocates for simulation-based training in basic surgical skills, highlighting the need for accessible and cost-effective models. Thus, this study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel Indigenous Cost-effective model for Incision & Drainage (NICA) of subcutaneous abscesses, addressing the gap in surgical education. METHODOLOGY: Following institutional ethics clearance, the study employed Kern's Six-step approach for curriculum development. The NICA model was conceptualized and crafted using locally available, low-cost materials, validated by expert opinion, and implemented in a simulation lab setting. A total of 155 surgical interns underwent training, consisting of didactic video sessions, hands-on practice with the NICA model, and structured assessments. Pre- and post-training evaluations were conducted to measure interns' performance and feedback.
resultsExpert validation confirmed NICA model's fidelity and usefulness. Training 155 surgical interns resulted in significant skill improvements. Pre-training, 33% correctly performed pre-procedural requisites, 46% executed procedural techniques, and 48% performed post-procedural steps accurately. Post-training, these percentages surged to 95%, 97%, and 98%, respectively. Post test score showed significant skill enhancements across all domains (p < 0.05). Intern feedback highlighted increased confidence, satisfaction, and interest in learning, affirming NICA model's effectiveness.
conclusionThe development and implementation of the NICA model offer a scalable and cost-effective solution for surgical training in resource-limited settings. The model's effectiveness in enhancing interns' skills and confidence underscores its potential to address training needs effectively. The study highlights the significance of simulation-based training in surgical education and advocates for the widespread adoption of indigenous low-cost models to improve surgical skills acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.