Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609787›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Let this be a safe place: a qualitative study into midwifery care for forcibly displaced women in the Netherlands.

J B Tankink, A E H Verschuuren, J P de Graaf, E I Feijen-de Jong, P J A van der Lans, M E T C van den Muijsenbergh, A Franx, B Goodarzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J B TankinkDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. jbtankink@gmail.com.
A E H VerschuurenDepartment of Health Sciences, Global Health Unit, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J P de GraafDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E I Feijen-de JongMidwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Netherlands & Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P J A van der LansPublic Health Services (GGD), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M E T C van den MuijsenberghDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
A FranxDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
B GoodarziMidwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Netherlands & Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 54300311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForcibly displaced women in the Netherlands face increased chances of perinatal mortality and other adverse pregnancy and childbirth outcomes compared to the resident country population, which has been linked to suboptimal care. This study was conducted to gain insights from the experiences of Dutch midwives to inform and enhance the provision of tailored and equitable care for forcibly displaced women.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with community midwives who provide care for forcibly displaced women (asylum seekers and recognized refugees) in the Netherlands. Through thematic analysis, we identified the barriers midwives encounter in providing care and explored their strategies for navigating these barriers, aiming to inform recommendations that advance equitable care provision.

resultsInterviews with eleven midwives revealed barriers across three thematic levels: (1) the interactional level, where barriers related to language and interpreters, cultural differences, and building trust impeded positive interactions between midwives and forcibly displaced women; (2) the organizational level, where barriers concerning relocations of asylum seekers, delays in accessing care, and interdisciplinary collaboration impeded optimal care; and (3) the contextual level, where barriers related to women's housing conditions, the resettlement process and the mental health of forcibly displaced women impeded midwives' to respond to clients' needs. These levels of barriers culminated in a core theme of imbalance between midwives' expanded responsibilities and the limited resources and strategies available to them in care for forcibly displaced women. This imbalance forced midwives into multiple roles, increased both the practical and emotional burden on them, and undermined their ability to provide optimal, equitable care.

conclusionsTo enhance the provision of equitable pregnancy and childbirth care for forcibly displaced women in the Netherlands, it is crucial to target the imbalance between the responsibilities that midwives bear and the resources available to them. This requires dismantling barriers at the interactional, organizational and contextual level of care through targeted policy interventions. Structural determinants that perpetuate the imbalance in midwives' work and restrict their scope of influence, such as restrictive migration policies that contribute to socioeconomic marginalization and poor housing conditions, need to be addressed. Ultimately, midwives themselves require more support and education to recognize and combat injustices in pregnancy and childbirth care for forcibly displaced women.

Indexed as

MidwiferyQualitative ResearchRefugeesAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal Health ServicesNetherlandsPregnancyAsylum SeekersBarriersEquitable careMidwifery careNetherlandsPregnancy and chidbirthQualitativeRefugees

Identifiers

PMID39609787
PMCPMC11605984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.