ArticleBMC cancer2024
Dosimetric effects of prone immobilization devices on skin in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge-based deep residual U-Net (DRU) for synthetic CT generation using a single MR volume for frameless radiosurgery.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Segmentation methods and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-printed immobilization devices in head and neck radiotherapy.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparative impact of supine vs prone positioning on dose distribution, acute toxicity, and setup error in postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a multidimensional propensity-matched cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Dosimetric impact of bolus thickness and immobilization mask use in postmastectomy radiotherapy: a chest wall thickness-based analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe dose perturbation effect of immobilization devices is often overlooked in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic cancer. This retrospective study assessed the dosimetric effects of a prone immobilization device combined with a belly board (PIDBB) on the skin.
methodsWe recruited 63 women with gynecologic cancer undergoing postoperative IMRT at our institute. A 0.3 cm thick skin contour and body contours with or without PIDBB system were outlined for each patient. Dose calculations were performed for the two sets of contours using the same plan, named Plan
resultsThe V
conclusionsWhile the PIDBB system effectively reduces the low dose to small intestine, it also induces radiation attenuation, leading to a sharp increase in skin dose, particularly in patients receiving radiation in the groin and perineum area. Therefore, immobilization devices should be included in the external contour to account for dose attenuation and the increment in skin dose.
trial registrationThis study does not report on interventions in human health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.