ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Estimating the link between service-user patient safety perceptions, incidents and subsequent contagion in acute mental health wards.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ward Atmosphere and Its Predictive Factors Among Psychiatric Nurses in Closed Psychiatric Wards: A Latent Profile Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafety incidents are common in adult acute inpatient mental health services, and detrimental to all. Incidents spread via social contagion within the ward, but social contagion is difficult to quantify. Better measures of social contagion could support a milieu in which safety incidents are less likely to be prolonged, spread, or repeated, with widespread benefits. The WardSonar project, based in the United Kingdom (UK), developed and evaluated a prototype digital safety monitoring tool to collect real-time information from patients on acute adult mental health wards, about their perceptions of ward safety. A prototype Wardsonar tool was developed from a collaborative, co-design approach, and implemented in real-world hospital settings. The current study aimed to understand whether the tool can help to predict incidents, by examining (i) the feasibility of capturing real-time feedback from patients about safety and (ii) how the resulting data related to quality and safety metrics. This study was registered as ISRCTN14470430 on 10/January/2022.
methodPatients can record real-time perceptions of ward safety using the tool, and staff can access these as anonymous, aggregated data. The tool was implemented in the UK in six National Health Service adult acute mental health wards. A novel approach to analysis involved construction of an hour-by-hour dataset over each ward. This revealed relationships between quantity and content of patient reports, staffing, time of day, and ward incidents, per ward.
resultsThere is strong evidence that an incident leads to increased probability of further incidents within the next four hours. This supports the idea of social/behavioural contagion and puts a measure on the extent to which the contagion persists. COVID-19 impacted the research processes.
conclusionsThere is potential to use the WardSonar digital tool for proactive real-time safety monitoring, to identify developing incidents and help staff to facilitate timely preventative or de-escalating interventions. Further refinement and testing in a post COVID-19 context are needed.
trial registrationISRCTN14470430 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14470430 . Registered 10/January/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.