ReviewBMC cancer2024
Human stem cell models to unravel brain cancer.
Review in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the lactate-metabolism related characteristics during the development of medulloblastoma through single-cell and bulk RNA-seq.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Modeling pediatric brain tumors with human stem cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-clinical animal models of human brain tumors have been invaluable tools for studying cancer pathogenesis and exploring novel treatment modalities. Such models recapitulate important aspects of the human disease such as the stem-progenitor-differentiated cell hierarchy. Although powerful, we argue that animal models are inherently limited in their ability to phenocopy certain important aspects of human brain tumor biology. We specifically highlight the inability of mouse models to generate certain forms aggressive pediatric medulloblastoma likely owing to cellular, anatomic, and genetic differences between the human and mouse brains. Additionally, we review some limitations of human brain tumor derived cell lines and outline why they are a sub-optimal system for purposes of pre-clinical modeling. Below, we present the case for human stem cell-based models of brain tumors, focusing mainly on glioblastoma and medulloblastoma. Drawing on several recently published studies, we review the exciting progress that has been made towards modeling human brain tumors using two-dimensional adherent stem cell cultures and three-dimensional organoids. We identify the important advances arrived at using these human stem cell-based models and suggest opportunities for future work in this direction. In this review article, we aim to highlight the utility and promises of human stem cell-based models of brain tumors as a complementary system to traditional transgenic animal and cell line systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.