ArticleHuman genomics2024
Long-read sequencing enables comprehensive molecular genetic diagnosis of Fabry disease.
Article in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of Fabry disease in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: A state-of-the-art review.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Review
- Is Fabry disease more prevalent than we think? Understanding the critical role of family screening can make all the difference.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- A New Class of Pathogenic Non-Coding Variants in GLA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Sequencing: Clinical Validation in Genetically Heterogeneous Disorders.Genes · 2025Article
- Genetic Insights and Diagnostic Challenges in Highly Attenuated Lysosomal Storage Disorders.Genes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical diagnosis of Fabry Disease (FD) can be challenging due to the clinical heterogeneity, especially in females. Patients with FD often experience a prolonged interval between the onset of symptoms and receiving a diagnosis. Genetic testing is the gold standard for precise diagnosis of FD, however conventional genetic testing could miss deep intronic variants and large deletions or duplications. Although next-generation sequencing, which analyzes numerous genes, has been successfully used for FD diagnosis and can detect complex variants, an effective and rapid tool for identifying a wide range of variants is imminent, contributing to decrease the diagnostic delay.
methodsThe comprehensive Analysis of FD (CAFD) assay was developed for FD genetic diagnosis, employing long-range PCR coupled with long-read sequencing to target the full-length GLA gene and its flanking regions. Its clinical performance was assessed through a comparative analysis with Sanger sequencing.
resultsGenetic testing was performed on 82 individuals, including 48 probands and 34 relatives. The CAFD assay additionally identified variants in two probands: one had a novel and de novo pathogenic variant with a 1715 bp insertion in intron 4, and the other carried two deep intronic VUS variants in cis-configuration also in intron 4. In total, CAFD identified 47 different variants among 48 probands. Of these, 42 (89.36%, 42/47) were pathogenic, while 5 (10.64%, 5/47) were VUS. Sixteen (34.04%, 16/47) of the variants were novel, including 15 SNV/Indels and one large intronic insertion. Pedigree analysis of 21 probands identified four de novo disease-causing variants. Hence, FD exhibits not only variable clinical presentations but also a wide spectrum of variants. Utilizing a comprehensive testing algorithm for diagnosing FD, which includes enzyme activity, clinical features, and genetic testing, the diagnostic yield of CAFD is 97.92% (47/48), which is higher than that of conventional Sanger sequencing, at 95.83% (46/48).
conclusionThe duration between initial clinical presentation and diagnosis remains long and winding. CAFD provides precise diagnosis for a wide spectrum of GLA variants, promoting timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment for FD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.