ArticleBMC plant biology2024
Hydraulic strategy defines contrasting responses to an abrupt precipitation during a successive lethal drought.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs precipitation patterns are predicted to become more erratic, it's vital to understand how abrupt climate events will affect woody seedlings that develop different hydraulic strategies. We cultivated anisohydric Robinia pseudoacacia L. and isohydric Quercus acutissima Carr. in a greenhouse, and subjected an abrupt precipitation event during a successive drought. Patterns of leaf and root gas exchange, leaf and stem hydraulics, seedlings growth, and non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) patterns were determined.
resultsWe found that as an anisohydric species, R. pseudoacacia seedlings adopted a strategy of sacrificing leaves in response to stress, resulting in the lowered photosynthesis and ultimately leading to a decrease in NSC accumulation. In contrast, isohydric Q. acutissima maintained the integrity of leaves by reducing respiratory consumption in response to drought stress, thereby ensured the stability of NSC pool.
conclusionR. pseudoacacia exhibited an extravagant strategy with efficient water transport, photosynthetic assimilation, and growth capabilities, but its resistance to embolism was relatively weak, while Q. acutissima adopted a resource-saving strategy with higher hydraulic safety. We also found that Q. acutissima seedlings were prone to allocate carbohydrates to maintain growth, while R. pseudoacacia preferred to sacrifice growth and aboveground NSC limitation only happened when precipitation was subjected after total stomatal closure. We thus believe that hydraulic strategy could define seedlings responses to drought and recovery, and further may adversely affect their re-sprouting capacity after drought stress relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.