Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609659›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2025

Ketamine for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: Double-blind active-controlled crossover study.

Ben Beaglehole, Paul Glue, Shona Neehoff, Shabah Shadli, Neil McNaughton, Bridget Kimber, Chrissie Muirhead, Aroha de Bie, Rachel Day-Brown, Natalie J Hughes-Medlicott

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Ketamine or Esketamine in Special Populations of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ben BeagleholeDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-1745
Paul GlueDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-2800
Shona NeehoffDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Shabah ShadliDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Neil McNaughtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-8221
Bridget KimberDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Chrissie MuirheadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Aroha de BieDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rachel Day-BrownDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Natalie J Hughes-MedlicottSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) may respond to ketamine treatment.

aimTo examine the responsiveness and tolerability of treatment-refractory OCD to intramuscular (IM) ketamine compared to IM fentanyl.

methodsThis was a randomised double-blind psychoactive-controlled study with single doses of racemic ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg or fentanyl 50 µg (psychoactive control). Pre-dosing with 4 mg oral ondansetron provided nausea prophylaxis. Eligible participants were aged between 18 and 50 years with severe treatment-resistant OCD. The primary efficacy measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Tolerability was measured with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). Repeated measures analysis of variance with orthogonal polynomial trends was used to assess the effect of drug treatment on Y-BOCS and CADSS scores.

resultsTwelve participants were randomised and 10 completed the study (7 females, 3 males, mean age 33 years). Two participants dropped out due to not tolerating dissociative effects associated with the study medication. The reductions in Y-BOCS scores were greater and statistically dose-related for both ketamine doses than fentanyl (dose [linear],

conclusionsWe provide further preliminary evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of IM ketamine in an outpatient cohort of OCD. Additional work is required to establish the optimal dosing regimen and longer-term role of ketamine for OCD. These findings are encouraging given the well-known limitations that exist for treatments in this area.

Indexed as

KetamineObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleFentanylHumansInjections, IntramuscularMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFentanylKetamineKetamineobsessive-compulsive disorder

Identifiers

PMID39609659
PMCPMC11760645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.