ArticleScientific reports2024
Deciphering cell to cell spatial relationship for pathology images using SpatialQPFs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spatial and temporal intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer: a systematic and conceptual review of single-cell and spatial omics studies.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Cross-Domain Benchmarking of Focus Measures for Smear-Microscopy Autofocus Under a Consensus-Audited Reference.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Rethinking pathology image analysis through shuffling.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- AI-based digital pathology and spatial proteomics enable precision oncology: A case report of recurrent melanoma in a young patient.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- SegJointGene: joint cell segmentation and spatial gene prioritization by information entropy guided convolutional neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- In silico models in oncology, neurology, and epidemiology: systems-level and multiscale perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- geneSCOPE: gene spatial co-occurrence of pairwise expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A hybrid ST-ViT-driven multimodal architecture combining spatiotemporal MRI patterns and radiomic features for enhanced prediction of pCR in neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy.Biology direct · 2026Article
- SlideMamba: entropy-based adaptive fusion of GNN and Mamba for enhanced representation learning in digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated tumor regression grade assessment and survival prediction in esophageal cancer via weakly supervised multiple instance learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based assessment of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC predicts outcome for patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A patient-aware benchmarking of CNN and transformer architectures for breast cancer histopathology classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding spatial dynamics within tissue microenvironments is crucial for deciphering cellular interactions and molecular signaling in living systems. These spatial characteristics govern cell distribution, extracellular matrix components, and signaling molecules, influencing local biochemical and biophysical conditions. Despite significant progress in analyzing digital pathology images, current methods for capturing spatial relationships are limited. They often rely on specific spatial features that only partially describe the complex spatial distributions of cells and are frequently tied to particular outcomes within predefined model frameworks. Furthermore, these methods are typically limited to field of view analysis, which restricts their capacity to capture spatial patterns across whole-slide images, thereby limiting their ability to fully address the complexities of tissue architecture. To address these limitations, we present SpatialQPFs (Spatial Quantitative Pathology Features), an R package designed to extract interpretable spatial features from cell imaging data using spatial statistical methodologies. Leveraging segmented cell information, our package offers a comprehensive toolkit for applying a range of spatial statistical methods within a stochastic process framework, including analyses of point process data, areal data, and geostatistical data. By decoupling feature extraction from specific outcome models, SpatialQPFs enables thorough large-scale spatial analyses applicable across diverse clinical and biological contexts. This approach enhances the depth and accuracy of spatial insights derived from tissue data, empowering researchers to conduct comprehensive spatial analyses efficiently and reproducibly. By providing a flexible and robust framework for spatial feature extraction, SpatialQPFs facilitates advanced spatial analyses, paving the way for new discoveries in tissue biology and pathology. SpatialQPFs code and documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/Genentech/SpatialQPFs .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.