Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609622›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

Structural MRI of brain similarity networks.

Isaac Sebenius, Lena Dorfschmidt, Jakob Seidlitz, Aaron Alexander-Bloch, Sarah E Morgan, Edward Bullmore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. New waves in psychiatric neuroimaging.Nature neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isaac Sebenius *Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. iss31@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-2150
Lena Dorfschmidt *Lifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. dorfschmia@chop.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-1104
Jakob SeidlitzLifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-7476
Aaron Alexander-BlochLifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sarah E MorganDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-5884
Edward BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283

Funding

Precision brain charts for imaging-genomics of schizophrenia and the psychosis spectrumR01MH133843 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Aaron Felix Alexander-Bloch · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in structural MRI analytics now allow the network organization of individual brains to be comprehensively mapped through the use of the biologically principled metric of anatomical similarity. In this Review, we offer an overview of the measurement and meaning of structural MRI similarity, especially in relation to two key assumptions that often underlie its interpretation: (i) that MRI similarity can be representative of architectonic similarity between cortical areas and (ii) that similar areas are more likely to be axonally connected, as predicted by the homophily principle. We first introduce the historical roots and technical foundations of MRI similarity analysis and compare it with the distinct MRI techniques of structural covariance and tractography analysis. We contextualize this empirical work with two generative models of homophilic networks: an economic model of cost-constrained connectional homophily and a heterochronic model of ontogenetically phased cortical maturation. We then review (i) studies of the genetic and transcriptional architecture of MRI similarity in population-averaged and disorder-specific contexts and (ii) developmental studies of normative cohorts and clinical studies of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Finally, we prioritize knowledge gaps that must be addressed to consolidate structural MRI similarity as an accessible, valid marker of the architecture and connectivity of an individual brain network.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAnimalsHumansNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID39609622
PMCPMC12936990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.