ArticleScientific reports2024
Group childcare has a positive impact on child development from the Japan Environment and Children's Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of socioeconomic status and nurturing environment with developmental outcomes in very preterm children without sensorimotor impairment: a secondary analysis of the INTACT study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl sulfonic and carboxylic acids and neurodevelopmental delay in children up to 5 years old: Effect modification by progesterone and estradiol.Eco-Environment & Health · 2026Article
- Association of intrapartum epidural analgesia and oxytocin exposure with offspring autism and neurodevelopment from the Japan Environment and Children's Study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Physical Activity Before and During Pregnancy and Neurodevelopment in Early Childhood.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of early group childcare on child development using data from the Japan Environment and Children's Study. This prospective cohort study enrolled participants between January 2011 and March 2014. The Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ)-3 was used to obtain data regarding group childcare and other factors. The participants were divided into two groups: the early childcare group (exposed group) and the non-early childcare group (control group). The ASQ-3 scores in all five domains, i.e., communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem-solving, and personal-social skills, were compared. A total of 39,894 participants were included in this study. The exposed and control groups comprised 13,674 and 26,220 participants, respectively. The number of participants with the ASQ-3 values below the cut-off value did not differ significantly between the two groups in any of the five domains at six months of age. However, the number of participants with the ASQ-3 values below the cut-off values was significantly lower in the exposed group for all five domains at three years of age. The difference between the two groups, especially in terms of communication and personal-social skills, increased with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.