Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609562›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Social stimuli impact behavioral responses to caffeine in the zebrafish.

Leah C Wilson, Megan Lyttle, Aya Kanan, Alissa Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leah C WilsonNeuroscience Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA. leahwilson@muhlenberg.edu.
Megan LyttleNeuroscience Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.
Aya KananNeuroscience Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.
Alissa LeNeuroscience Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine is a widely consumed stimulant with dose-dependent effects on behavior. Across species, lower doses tend be anxiolytic and increase activity, while higher doses tend to be anxiogenic and decrease activity. Given the importance of the social environment on stress responses, we investigated how social stimuli modulate behavioral responses to caffeine. We exposed adult zebrafish to low (25 mg/L) or moderate (60 mg/L) caffeine either in isolation or within view of a stimulus group. Zebrafish are highly social, and social stimuli are known to buffer responses to environmental stressors. As predicted, we found that isolated fish were more sensitive to caffeine's anxiogenic effects and less sensitive to caffeine's stimulant effects. Among socially-exposed individuals, caffeine decreased social approach. Our data illustrate the importance of social context. Understanding how social cues shape pharmacological responses is important for understanding the external validity of studies that investigate drug effects in social species.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCaffeineSocial BehaviorZebrafishAnimalsAnxietyCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleMaleCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCaffeine, Anxiety, Social Preference, Danio rerio, Social Buffering

Identifiers

PMID39609562
PMCPMC11605092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.