ArticleNature biomedical engineering2025
Safer and efficient base editing and prime editing via ribonucleoproteins delivered through optimized lipid-nanoparticle formulations.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Non-Viral CRISPR carriers: transient delivery with lasting effects.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Efficient PE system PE7-scFv-MLH1dn by optimizing the configuration of La and MLH1dn.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- CRISPR RNP-Mediated Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Plants: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions for Tree Species.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Editing around the target: epitope engineering to protect stem cell grafts.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Chemically modified CRISPR enzymes for multi-organ genome editingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dense RNA motif modifications enable robust in vivo prime editing and enhance efficiencies of diverse editing systems.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 and precision editing technologies linking functional genomics to clinical translation in genetic diseases.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Transgene-free genome editing in plants.aBIOTECH · 2026Review
- Advances in vehicles for in situ delivery: From classical vectors to biologically inspired structures.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Non-Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy and Gene Delivery: From Lipid Nanoparticles to Engineered Extracellular Vesicles.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Delivering the future of immunotherapy: A state-of-the-art review of gene editing in immune cells with lipid nanoparticles.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Structure-guided engineering of AI-derived adenine base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Efficient in vivo cytosine base editing using virus-like particles with uracil DNA glycosylase inhibition.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Genome Editing: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Perspectives.MedComm · 2026Review
- Engineered transformer base editor with unconstrained PAM requirements.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Review
- Prime editing in neuropsychiatric disorders: From mutation-specific target selection to clinical translation.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Prime editing updates: technological evolution, methodological expansion, and delivery strategies for in vivo applications.BMB reports · 2026Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delivering ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) for in vivo genome editing is safer than using viruses encoding for Cas9 and its respective guide RNA. However, transient RNP activity does not typically lead to optimal editing outcomes. Here we show that the efficiency of delivering RNPs can be enhanced by cell-penetrating peptides (covalently fused to the protein or as excipients) and that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) encapsulating RNPs can be optimized for enhanced RNP stability, delivery efficiency and editing potency. Specifically, after screening for suitable ionizable cationic lipids and by optimizing the concentration of the synthetic lipid DMG-PEG 2000, we show that the encapsulation, via microfluidic mixing, of adenine base editor and prime editor RNPs within LNPs using the ionizable lipid SM102 can result in in vivo editing-efficiency enhancements larger than 300-fold (with respect to the delivery of the naked RNP) without detectable off-target edits. We believe that chemically defined LNP formulations optimized for RNP-encapsulation stability and delivery efficiency will lead to safer genome editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.