Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Analysis of four long non-coding RNAs for hepatocellular carcinoma screening and prognosis by the aid of machine learning techniques.

Ahmed Samir, Amira Abdeldaim, Ammar Mohammed, Asmaa Ali, Mohamed Alorabi, Mariam M Hussein, Yasser Mabrouk Bakr, Asmaa Mohamed Ibrahim, Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetic Mechanisms Involved in Hcv Infection and Human HCC.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed SamirDepartment of biochemistry, Faculty of pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Giza, Egypt. samiraboelnoor@gmail.com.
Amira AbdeldaimDepartment of biochemistry, Faculty of pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Giza, Egypt.
Ammar MohammedFaculty of computer science, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Giza, Egypt.
Asmaa AliDepartment of Chest Diseases, Abbasia Chest Hospital, Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed AlorabiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mariam M HusseinDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yasser Mabrouk BakrCancer Biology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Asmaa Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Shefaa Al Orman Oncology Hospital, Luxor, Egypt.
Ahmed Samir AbdelhafizDepartment of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant health burden in Egypt, largely attributable to the endemic prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses. Early identification of HCC remains a challenge due to the lack of widespread screening among at-risk populations. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of machine learning in predicting HCC by analyzing the combined expression of lncRNAs and conventional laboratory biomarkers. Plasma levels of four lncRNAs (LINC00152, LINC00853, UCA1, and GAS5) were quantified in a cohort of 52 HCC patients and 30 age-matched controls. The individual diagnostic performance of each lncRNA was assessed using ROC curve analysis. Subsequently, a machine learning model was constructed using Python's Scikit-learn platform to integrate these lncRNAs with additional clinical laboratory parameters for HCC diagnosis. Individual lncRNAs exhibited moderate diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 60 to 83% and 53-67%, respectively. In contrast, the machine learning model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Notably, a higher LINC00152 to GAS5 expression ratio significantly correlated with increased mortality risk. The integration of lncRNA biomarkers with conventional laboratory data within a machine learning framework demonstrates significant potential for developing a precise and cost-effective diagnostic tool for HCC. To enhance the model's robustness and prognostic capabilities, future studies should incorporate larger cohorts and explore a wider array of lncRNAs.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningRNA, Long NoncodingAgedCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorGAS5 long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, Long NoncodingHCClncRNAsMachine learningScreening

Identifiers

PMID39609501
PMCPMC11604705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.