ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of microbial diversity in the formation water of the producer and marginal wells in bokaro coal field.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rise in global energy demand has prompted research on developing strategies for transforming conventional nonrenewable sources to cleaner fuels. Biogenic methane production is a promising source that caters to increasing energy demands. Therefore, research to enhance their production is of great importance. Implementation of successful enhancement strategies requires knowledge of the factors impacting coalbed methane production. The microbial diversity of the formation water in coal seams is the crucial parameter influencing biomethane production. This study explores microbial diversity in the Producing and Marginal wells of Bokaro, India, intending to understand the potential application of microbial-enhanced coalbed methane technology in the marginal wells of this reservoir. The high throughput sequencing analysis revealed the presence of both archaeal and bacterial groups in both well types. The result showed significant differences in the diversity of the samples from the two well groups, suggesting the immense role played by the microbes in producing methane gas. Random forest analysis shows genera Gelria, Methanothermobacter, Thaurea, Youngiibacter, and Proteiniclasticum in the Producing wells while Roseomonas, Rhodobacter, Mycobacterium, Methylobacter, and Bosea in the Marginal wells as the significant contributor in differentiating the overall diversity between the wells of Bokaro. The current study is the first to show microbial uniqueness in coalbed methane wells based on gas production efficiency. It also explores the role of physicochemical factors in framing microbial community structure in the wells. The results provide salient information that will help better understand the impact of microbial diversity on the production of coalbed methane wells of studied coal seams. This knowledge will further aid in exploring the prospects of microbial-enhanced methane in the Marginal wells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.