ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2024
Implementing genomic medicine in clinical practice for adults with undiagnosed rare diseases.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility of Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Hospitalized Adults With Unexplained Neurologic Presentations.Neurology · 2026Article
- A scalable approach for genomic-first rare disorder detection in a healthcare-based population.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global burden of undiagnosed diseases, particularly in adults, is rising due to their significant socioeconomic impact. To address this, we enrolled 232 adult probands with undiagnosed conditions, utilizing bioinformatics tools for genetic analysis. Alongside exome and genome sequencing, repeat-primed PCR and Cas9-mediated nanopore sequencing were applied to suspected short tandem repeat disorders. Probands were classified into probable genetic (n = 128) or uncertain (n = 104) origins. The study found genetic causes in 66 individuals (28.4%) and non-genetic causes in 12 (5.2%), with a longer diagnostic journey for those in the probable genetic group or with pediatric symptom onset, emphasizing the need for increased efforts in these populations. Genetic diagnoses facilitated effective surveillance, cascade screening, drug repurposing, and pregnancy planning. This study demonstrates that integrating sequencing technologies improves diagnostic accuracy, may shorten the time to diagnosis, and enhances personalized management for adults with undiagnosed diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.