Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609431›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2024

Outcomes with loncastuximab tesirine following CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Narendranath Epperla, Melanie Lucero, Tom Bailey, Laura Mirams, Jolenta Cheung, Mona Amet, Gary Milligan, Lei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Narendranath EpperlaDivision of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. naren.epperla@hci.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-3457
Melanie LuceroADC Therapeutics, New Providence, NJ, USA.
Tom BaileyAdelphi Real World, Macclesfield, UK.
Laura MiramsAdelphi Real World, Macclesfield, UK.
Jolenta CheungAdelphi Real World, Macclesfield, UK.
Mona AmetAdelphi Real World, Macclesfield, UK.
Gary MilliganAdelphi Real World, Macclesfield, UK.
Lei ChenADC Therapeutics, New Providence, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine (lonca) following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) progression/failure is unknown. Hence, we sought to examine real-world use and outcomes of lonca following CAR-T in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the USA. In this retrospective study, we included adults (age ≥ 18 years) with R/R DLBCL who received lonca monotherapy as third- (3 L) or fourth line (4 L) treatment after progressing on second line (2 L) or 3 L CAR-T, respectively. Post-CAR-T lonca outcomes included response rates (overall response rate [ORR] and complete response [CR] rate), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis with 95 receiving lonca following 2 L CAR-T (median age:66 years; 61% male) and 23 following 3 L CAR-T (median age:57 years; 43% male). Patients with 2 L CAR-T/3 L lonca had an ORR of 73% (CR rate of 34%). With a median follow-up of 8.5 months following lonca initiation, median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. The DOR, PFS, and OS at 12 months were 68%, 77%, and 84%, respectively. Patients with 3 L CAR-T/4 L lonca had an ORR of 78% (CR rate of 17%). With a median follow-up of 13 months following lonca initiation, the median DOR and PFS were 7.6 and 12.0 months, while median OS was not reached. OS at 12 months was 95%. In this study, we found that lonca monotherapy was an effective treatment option in R/R DLBCL in 3 L and 4 L settings including those who were resistant to or progressed after CAR-T.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzodiazepinesImmunoconjugatesloncastuximab tesirine

Identifiers

PMID39609431
PMCPMC11604956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.