Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609372›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2025

Secondary Risk-Reducing Strategies for Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jing Yu, Shan Jiang, Taoran Liu, Yangyang Gao, Xinyang Ma, Ginenus Fekadu, Yunqiu Xia, Bonny Parkinson, Wai-Kit Ming, Yuanyuan Gu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing Yu *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shan Jiang *Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Taoran Liu *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yangyang GaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xinyang MaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ginenus FekaduDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yunqiu XiaDepartment of Dermatology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Bonny ParkinsonMacquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. wkming2@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-7515
Yuanyuan GuMacquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. yuanyuan.gu@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer poses significant challenges, especially the increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in BRCA1/2 variant carriers. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of secondary risk-reducing strategies for CBC in BRCA1/2 carriers.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted from January 2000 to December 2023, including RCTs, cohort, or case-control studies involving BRCA carriers with unilateral breast cancer. Random-effects models were used for odds ratios (ORs) on CBC incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), with bias assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

resultsA total of 23,840 participants from 26 studies were included. Secondary risk-reducing interventions reduced CBC incidence by 38% [OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.68] and improved OS by 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.67). Subgroup analyses showed differences by BRCA type, menopausal status, and treatment duration. For BRCA1 carriers, chemotherapy was most effective, while, for BRCA2, it was endocrine therapy. Postmenopausal interventions reduced CBC by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.71), while premenopausal carriers saw a 34% reduction (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.82). Tamoxifen's effect diminished over time.

conclusionSecondary prophylaxis reduces CBC and improves OS in BRCA1/2 carriers, with variations by genetic and physiological factors. These findings underscore the need for personalized strategies, considering menopausal status and treatment duration.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryFemaleHeterozygoteHumansBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1/2Contralateral breast cancer (CBC)Precision medicineSecondary risk-reducing strategiesSystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39609372
PMCPMC12795943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.