ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Unilateral nerve preservation during parametrectomy is not sufficient to prevent persistent urinary retention after cytoreductive endometriosis surgery.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Dyspareunia One Year After Nerve-Sparing Endometriosis Surgery: An Observational Study Highlighting Undesirable Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Safety and Reproductive Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Nerve-Sparing Surgery for Deep Endometriosis in Infertile Women: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Follow-up of bowel endometriosis resections performed using the double circular stapler technique: A decade's experience.PloS one · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to quantify the risks of urinary retention following different levels or degrees of nerve preservation during parametrectomies for deep endometriosis (DE).
methodsWomen undergoing laparoscopic and robotic nerve-sparing DE surgeries were studied. The cases were divided into 6 groups according to the degree of preservation of parasympathetic parametrium fibers on each side: P1 (P1 left /P1 right-Excellent preservation: presacral and pararectal fascia bilateral preservation), P2 (P1/P2 or P2/P1, P2/P2-Regular preservation: fascia violation with local fat visualization-either of both sides; and P3 (P1/P3 or P3/P1, P2/P3 or P3/P2, P3/P3)-Poor preservation: musculature and pelvic floor exposure-even if only unilateral.
resultsOf a total of 151 women eligible for the study, 110 (72.8%) had excellent nerve preservation; 24 (15.8%) had regular nerve preservation, and 17 (11.2%) had poor-nerve preservation. The incidence of elevated PVR was higher in the P3 group. Thirty-five patients were catheterized post-operatively, more common in the P3 group. In four cases from the P3 group, prolonged intermittent self-catheterization after discharge was necessary. The calculated risk of needing intermittent catheterization in the P3 group was 23.1% up to 8 weeks and 7.7% up to 8 months post-surgery.
conclusionParametrectomy with poor-nerve preservation can lead to urinary retention, even with excellent contralateral preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39609310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.