Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609298›Full record

ReviewPlant reproduction2024

Twin embryo formation by induced parthenogenesis.

Hannah Peha, Hui Ren, Debra Skinner, Venkatesan Sundaresan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering Synthetic Apomixis in Hybrid Rice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Research Advances in Multiple Embryos and Apomixis in Rice (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah Peha *Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8793-6069
Hui Ren *Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4095-619X
Debra SkinnerDepartment of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4715-670X
Venkatesan SundaresanDepartment of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. sundar@ucdavis.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-0630

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS1936872National Science Foundation IOS2343681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageInduction of parthenogenesis (embryo formation from unfertilized egg cells) by embryogenic transcription factors is associated with twin formation at high frequencies, and involves two distinct mechanisms. Synthetic apomixis has been achieved through the induction of parthenogenesis by ectopic expression of the Baby Boom family of transcription factors. An associated phenomenon from this process is the formation of polyembryony including twin progeny at high frequencies, but the underlying mechanisms have not been explored. Here, we provide a brief description of the phenomenon, discuss potential mechanisms for twin formation in flowering plants, propose two possible models for their occurrence, and evaluate the available evidence from both dizygotic and monozygotic twins in relation to these models. The two proposed models are independent, but they can operate in combination. We conclude that both models are required to explain the types of twins and triplets that we and others have observed. These models provide future directions for basic research, as well as suggest possible approaches towards reducing polyembryony when incorporating synthetic apomixis into crop plants such as maize where twinning is not desirable.

Indexed as

ParthenogenesisSeedsApomixisApomixisDizygoticMonozygoticPolyembryonyZygote

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.